moviboxxyz Logo

Title Matrix

Into the Wild

Biographies & Memoirs
Tahun2007
Durasi7h 5m

Publisher's Summary In April 1992 a young man from a well-to-do family hitchhiked to Alaska and walked alone into the wilderness north of Mt. McKinley. His name was Christopher Johnson McCandless. He had given $25,000 in savings to charity, abandoned his car and most of his possessions, burned all the cash in his wallet, and invented a new life for himself. His body - along with a camera with five rolls of film, an SOS note, and a cryptic diary written in the back pages of a book about edible plants - was found six months later by a hunter. ©2007 Jon Krakauer (P)2007 Random House, Inc. Random House Audio, a division of Random House, Inc.

Mungkin Anda Juga Suka

Komentar

10 Komentar

🌈🦋Modesta🧚🏼‍♀️✨Sep 19, 2022
JulesSep 19, 2022
Deedee Joyce RakoroMSep 19, 2022
Pedro SebastiãoSep 19, 2022
leticiaimon5@gmail.comSep 19, 2022
EL~~♥️💫Sep 19, 2022
user2514051663738Sep 19, 2022
mankrankSep 19, 2022
محمد رشادSep 19, 2022

That's three borings. One for the story, one for the narration and one for the lack of a story. I wanted to listen to this because I heard the movie was very powerful and well done. Obviously this book did not serve as a precursor to the script. There are so many people who "walked into the wild" written about that the listner has a hard time remembering who the book is about. I realize the author is trying to create parallels between all these people but the amount of information shared just doesn't quite bring it together. Also, the narrator is so monotone, perhaps by design, that it's hard to stay engaged. I guess I should have gone to the movie instead.

BalqeesFathiSep 19, 2022

The story of and details surrounding Christopher McCandless's death are fascinating. Having seen the movie and taking and interest in his life I was pleased to find much more back story and detail then could have been fit into a film. The only problem is the author, who seems to be trying to sound smart by using as many "big words" as possible. He also spends way too much time on his own stories and experiences, which is not relevant to the subject matter. Sometimes he tries to psychoanalyze McCandless, quite poorly I might add. I listened to this book off and on, only as long as I could stand the author for each session.