Tin & Tina

I disliked this from the very start, giving it two stars about halfway through before downgrading it to one star. It's pig swill and the director shouldn't be allowed near a studio again. Why though? Here are some notes I made: Unoriginal: Adopted children get taken from an orphanage and end up evil. Oooooo, someone give them a prize for that amazing concept that hasn't been done loads of times before. Leave off orphans you plebs. Terrible dubbing: The dubbing is APPALLING. Everyone sounds like they have learning difficulties. Insult to religion: I'm not overly religious but this insults religious people as much as it insults orphans. Stupid nuns: The nuns are pathetic mind warped 2D parodies of actual people who may or may not (unreliable narrator) physically abuse the children. Dumb parents: The freakish kids kill the family dog, tie up the mum and then nearly drown the baby. Thankfully the stupid parents get rid of the brats after the last one. The father is a mouth breather and couldn't possibly be an airline pilot. Annoying children not helped to fit in: At best these kids are mentally ill victims of child abuse. I don't know also why they dress so weird in the film. Any normal parents would help them to blend in. Just becomes boring and weird after the kids leave: When they kids leave the film gets dull. Also the guy gets on fire after being struck by lightning. What? The ending: What absolute spoon wrote this bilge? Why in the name of all that is good and proper would you ever take those kids back? It's pathetic and as I said, the writer and directors should never work again. At the end of the day the characters aren't real but these people "making films" shouldn't be allowed to.

If there is one thing I hate in this world it's religions, certainly fanatics that can't stop whining about it. And kids, can't say I'm a big fan of them either. And that's exactly what this movie is about, two albino kids that go on and on about religion. The majority will find them creepy and I get that but I just found them annoying. Still I did enjoy watching Tin and Tina, it's good enough to watch one time, just don't expect much horror. From the cast I only know Jaime Lorente that played Denver in the immensely popular series La Casa de Papel (or Money Heist for the English title). The acting wasn't bad in this move although the irritating voices of the kids were a bit annoying to listen to, just like their characters were.

3.5/10 for this utter BOREFEST. Again, I do not understand this new-age phenomenon of the directors and writers having a very workable plot, yet failing to develop it. Is it incompetence? Is it a lack of creativity? Or is it sadism? Tin & Tina presents a very shallow story without any details and without much outline. It's a concoction of randomness, nothing falls into place. The acting was decent. And I frankly did not understand the last scene - were the writers drunk or just stupid? Perhaps they were pissed at the production company. In the ending - the husband is having a conversation with his wife about a potential divorce, trying to convince her to not leave him, and all of a sudden, the power goes out because of the rain. Now, you'd expect that a normal person would prioritise his finding a solution to a tumultuous moment in his marriage, but this guy decides to casually go and fix the TV instead. He literally leaves in the middle of the conversation as he is giving reasons to his wife to stay with him - TO FIX THE TV. To add to the lack of human intellect, he does it during a storm. That pretty much summarises this movie. In conclusion, would I watch it for the second time? Nope. Would I recommend you to watch it for a first time? No, unless you are a sadist who thinks that time is a mere illusion.

Not sure if I should call it horror, there are definitely moments of scare though not arising from a ghost but acts of creepy children. The kids are brought up in a convent and due to indoctrination bring religion in every aspect to the extent of harming others. The wife is not really comfortable with them from the get go while the husband is always justifying their wrong doings. During the initial parts of the movie it seems that its just the evilness of the children that is at play here but the end makes you question if its just the children or there is something else in the play. The writers suggest both. On one hand it seems the siblings were conspiring to invade their house and might even have come before the couple's car at night and the music being played. But during the fire they are nowhere to be found and one wonders if they are capable enough to escape the convent on a stormy night and burn a man all by themselves and the wife searching for her baby tries the suffocation method to try find him back and starts having faith again. Is the movie trying to infuse faith in people who have lost it. The end leave you with questions and confused. But still it turned out better than expectations.

Oh my god. Am so bored watch this. Maybe the intention is to make it slow burn but it does successfully making me falling asleep. The story is oke i guess. So many many flaws and so many things that are nonsense. This is more like that awful movie 'orphan' the father never sees the bad side of the kids. And well, ending up dies. The idea is quite similar with religion stuff in it. I dont know what to say to make this review 500 characters however am so bored watching this. It feels like punishment ... and at the end, they are innocent? Come on they aren't. They are not well in the head. It's not up to them to punish people. They aren't God. Idk. Dont waste your time.