Red Winter

Worse acting I ever seen in 65 years. Camera work was weak. Special effects amateur. Fighting between the actors was like looking a a little kid pushing another. Film must of cost a total of a few thousand dollars including paying the so called actors. Music was like listening to church organ.lead actress had no concept at how to show feelings. Our actors felt like they had an earpiece telling them what to say. Absolutely no character study. Movie doesn't even show where the killers came from or what they had to do. The only thing that looked real was the snow it was real. Some scenery was breathtaking.

The plot is predictable, the characters are carelessly sketched, and worse that the actors look helplessly exhausted. The only nice part of the film was the starting sequence when the deer is trapped in suffering. And here we the audiences retain the same throughout the film. After first 40 minutes all I was wishing was for the film to end. And it did, but after a long time. If you want to see a thriller there are many titles available and if you still can't figure out, just go for the Bruce Willis original flick "Die Hard" and you will still love it even after watching it 100 times. This one's bad and very sad.

Don't get me wrong, I've seen some TRULY horrible films ("Rollergator" and "Feeders" come to mind), so I know just how low quality can get. This isn't that severe by a long shot. However, it's definitely a pass. "Sharknado" has better acting and production quality. This is mediocre acting, a convoluted, meandering plot and action scenes that are confusing and lazy. The production didn't even bother to use squibs on the many gunshots throughout. If this was a student's first film I would still say they have a lot to learn. About the only moderately decent factor was the music. The rest of the sound was poor.

The plot is predictable, the characters are carelessly sketched, and worse that the actors look helplessly exhausted. The only nice part of the film was the starting sequence when the deer is trapped in suffering. And here we the audiences retain the same throughout the film. After first 40 minutes all I was wishing was for the film to end. And it did, but after a long time. If you want to see a thriller there are many titles available and if you still can't figure out, just go for the Bruce Willis original flick "Die Hard" and you will still love it even after watching it 100 times. This one's bad and very sad.

Don't get me wrong, I've seen some TRULY horrible films ("Rollergator" and "Feeders" come to mind), so I know just how low quality can get. This isn't that severe by a long shot. However, it's definitely a pass. "Sharknado" has better acting and production quality. This is mediocre acting, a convoluted, meandering plot and action scenes that are confusing and lazy. The production didn't even bother to use squibs on the many gunshots throughout. If this was a student's first film I would still say they have a lot to learn. About the only moderately decent factor was the music. The rest of the sound was poor.

Worse acting I ever seen in 65 years. Camera work was weak. Special effects amateur. Fighting between the actors was like looking a a little kid pushing another. Film must of cost a total of a few thousand dollars including paying the so called actors. Music was like listening to church organ.lead actress had no concept at how to show feelings. Our actors felt like they had an earpiece telling them what to say. Absolutely no character study. Movie doesn't even show where the killers came from or what they had to do. The only thing that looked real was the snow it was real. Some scenery was breathtaking.